Samsung argued that a penalty of $28 million was appropriate and Apple was looking for $1.07 billion in damages.
Apple believes Samsung’s stance would mean a carmaker could build something just like a Volkswagen Beetle but then pay damages only based on the outside shell, but Samsung thinks Apple’s stance would mean a company infringing a cupholder design would have to pay patents on an entire car. Samsung didn’t fight Apple’s suggested $5.3 million penalty for infringing two utility patents.
The three design patents in the case were:
â— US Patent No. D618,677 (D’677) which describes a black, rectangular, round-cornered front face for an electronic device
â— US Patent No. D593,087 (D’087) which describes a similar rectangular round-cornered front face plus the surrounding bezel
â— US Patent No. D604,305 (D’305) which describes a colorful grid of icons
The case is Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., 11-cv-01846, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California (San Jose).